AI Prompts to Improve Existing Content Marketing

Prompt Engineering for Content Marketing

Artificial Intelligence Content Marketing SEO Article
20 mins

ø AI Prompts to Help Improve Existing Content Marketing

Step‑by‑step prompt frameworks for improving existing content, including why it works, workflow, a ready‑to‑copy prompt, example, and what to measure next:

Editorial Refresh Sprint

Search Intent Alignment and SEO Refresh

Brand Voice and Persona Rewrite

Competitor Gap and Differntiation Builder

Content Atomiser and Refresh Calendar

This is the first in a series of posts detailing advanced prompt techniques for common digital marketing activities. You can simply cut and paste the prompts highlighted below and replace the text [in brackets like this] to give the prompt your context. However, if you want to get more from the prompts, check out the 'Why this works" bullets to try and understand the particular techniques at play, and how you might apply these to your future prompts. We've also provided the "What to measure" section so that you can measure the impact of prompts output, and see how it improve your existing content.

Editorial Refresh Sprint

Rigorous edit that improves clarity, structure, search alignment and persuasion without losing the original intent.

Why this works:

  • Forces a diagnose then fix approach using a clear audit rubric.
  • Builds two contrasted rewrites so you can compare risk.
  • Produces a complete conversion and SEO pack in one pass.
  • Bakes in accessibility and inclusion so the edit helps all readers.

Quick workflow

  1. Paste the content and fill the context fields.
  2. Run with an advanced reasoning model for the audit, prioritisation and section rewrites.
  3. Use a faster model to spin up metadata, FAQs and microcopy.
  4. Pick Version A or B for the live page and keep the other as a test variant.

Copy‑and‑paste prompt:

You are a senior content editor for [INDUSTRY/BRAND]. Your task is to diagnose and improve the following content to maximise clarity, usefulness, search alignment and conversion.

Context:
- Business goal: [e.g., increase demo requests by 20%]
- Primary audience: [e.g., UK mid-market HR leaders]
- Secondary audience: [optional]
- Product/service: [describe]
- Constraints: [legal, compliance, claims to avoid]
- Target keywords or themes: [list]
- Brand voice: [e.g., practical, warm, expert; British English]

Content to improve:
[PASTE FULL TEXT OR OUTLINE]

Process:
1) Ask up to 5 targeted questions if critical information is missing. Otherwise proceed.
2) Audit the current piece using a rubric that scores 0–5 on: structure, clarity, evidence/E‑E‑A‑T, search intent fit, topical completeness, brand voice fit, readability, accessibility and inclusivity, differentiation, and conversion cues. Present a table with scores and 1–2 example quotes per criterion.
3) Identify the top 10 issues and opportunities. Prioritise with RICE (Reach, Impact, Confidence, Effort). Show a ranked table and a 90‑day action plan split into Quick wins (1–2 weeks) and Strategic moves (4–12 weeks).
4) Propose an improved outline with H1/H2/H3, section purposes, and word count ranges.
5) Produce two alternative rewrites of one representative section:
   - Version A: Conservative edit that preserves structure.
   - Version B: Transformative edit that reframes the narrative and strengthens POV.
   For each, include rationale and expected impact on KPIs.
6) Create conversion assets: 3 CTA lines, 2 email capture prompts, 5 internal link anchor suggestions with target page types.
7) Supply on‑page SEO elements: title tag (≤60 chars), meta description (≤155 chars), OG title and description, 5 FAQ entries aligned to likely user questions.
8) Accessibility and inclusion: reading age estimate, plain‑English summary (100 words), alt text suggestions for 3 likely images, inclusive language fixes.
9) Changelog: a concise bullet list of edits with reasons, in priority order.
10) Output everything in Markdown with clear section headings. Keep British English. Do not disclose internal reasoning.

Deliverables:
- Audit table
- Prioritised backlog with RICE
- Improved outline
- Two contrasted rewrites of a key section
- Conversion and SEO assets
- Accessibility improvements
- Changelog

What to measure next:

  • Form conversion rate on the page
  • Scroll depth and section dwell time
  • Lift in target keyword rankings
  • Accessibility checks pass rate

Join Target Internet for Live Masterclasses

Search Intent Alignment and SEO Refresh

Fixes misalignment between what searchers want and what your page delivers.

Why this works:

  • Makes the model state and test intent hypotheses before rewriting.
  • Maps topical entities and sub‑questions to ensure completeness.
  • Produces two outlines so you can trade off search‑first vs story‑first.
  • Delivers a snippet‑ready answer and structured data suggestions.

Quick workflow:

  • Fill in keyword, geography and funnel stage.
  • Run with an advanced reasoning model for intent, gap map and outlines.
  • Use a faster model for FAQs, metadata and internal link lists.
  • Choose the outline style that fits your goal and publish a refreshed draft.

Copy‑and‑paste prompt:

Act as an SEO content strategist. Realign the following content to dominant search intent and modern on‑page best practice without browsing.

Inputs:
- Primary keyword/topic: [e.g., "HR analytics software"]
- Secondary and related entities: [list]
- Target geography: [e.g., UK and EU]
- Funnel stage focus: [e.g., consideration]
- Business goal + KPI: [e.g., free trial starts]
- Brand voice and tone: [e.g., authoritative, approachable]
- Constraints: [claims to avoid, regulated terms]
- Competitor angles to avoid or counter: [if any]

Content to improve:
[PASTE FULL TEXT]

Tasks:
1) Intent hypothesis: define likely search intents (informational, commercial research, transactional). State assumptions and confidence levels.
2) Gap map: list subtopics, questions, and entities commonly expected by readers for this topic. Mark which are missing or thin. Present a table with Priority (High/Med/Low) and Reason.
3) Outline v1 "Search‑first" and Outline v2 "Story‑first". Explain trade‑offs and recommend one based on goals.
4) Generate 8–12 H2/H3 suggestions with semantic clusters and target word counts. Include a short content brief for each section.
5) Draft a featured‑snippet ready answer (40–55 words), plus a longer summary (120–160 words).
6) On‑page pack: title tag, meta description, OG tags, 5 FAQs, and a short URL suggestion.
7) Internal linking plan: 10 suggested anchors with target page types and rationale.
8) Structured data suggestions: propose suitable schema types and provide a placeholder JSON‑LD block with variables to fill later.
9) Provide two contrasted rewrites for the introduction:
   - Version A: high‑clarity, scannable
   - Version B: narrative hook with authority signals
10) Output in Markdown. Keep British English. Do not disclose internal reasoning. Ask up to 3 clarifying questions only if a field is blank.

What to measure next:

  • Primary keyword rank and featured snippet ownership
  • Organic CTR and bounce rate
  • Internal link click‑through to pricing and demo pages

 

Brand Voice, Accessibility and Persona Rewrite

Correct content that is accurate but off‑brand or exclusionary.

Why this works:

  • Extracts a mini voice guide from your samples so the rewrite is consistent.
  • Uses role‑play critiques to surface clarity gaps and objections.
  • Delivers two rewrites: a voice‑true version and a persona‑tuned variant.
  • Adds inclusive language fixes and plain‑English summaries.

Quick workflow:

  1. Paste two or three voice samples or list voice adjectives.
  2. Run with an advanced reasoning model for voice extraction and rewrites.
  3. Use a faster model for CTAs, subject lines and alt text.
  4. Share the one‑page style card with your team to keep future content aligned.

Copy‑and‑paste prompt:

You are Head of Brand and an accessibility reviewer. Calibrate brand voice from samples, then rewrite the content to match that voice while improving inclusivity and clarity.

Inputs:
- Voice samples: [paste 2–3 short brand excerpts] or list voice adjectives [e.g., practical, empathetic, expert]
- Audience: [primary and secondary]
- Purpose and KPI: [e.g., book a call]
- Reading level target: [e.g., GCSE, undergraduate]
- Sensitivities or terms to avoid: [list]
- British English

Content to improve:
[PASTE FULL TEXT]

Process:
1) Derive a mini voice guide: tone sliders (formality, warmth, energy), sentence length range, POV, jargon allowance, words to use/avoid. Present as a table.
2) Role‑play critiques:
   - As a first‑time reader in [AUDIENCE], list what feels unclear or unhelpful.
   - As a sceptical budget‑holder, list objections the content fails to address.
3) Rewrite the piece in two modes:
   - Voice‑true version adhering strictly to the mini guide.
   - Persona‑tuned version for [SPECIFIC ICP], noting 3 changes and why.
4) Micro‑improvements: CTA options (6), button labels (6), subject lines (6), preview text (6).
5) Accessibility: reading age estimate, plain‑English 120‑word summary, inclusive language fixes with before/after examples, alt text suggestions for 3 likely images.
6) Provide a one‑page style card that can be reused by other writers.

Output: Markdown with clear headings. Do not reveal hidden reasoning.

What to measure next:

  • Readability score and time on page
  • Donation click‑through rate by segment
  • Brand language audit compliance rate across pages

 

Competitor Gap and Differentiation Builder

When your rivals publish near‑identical content and you need a stance that wins preference.

Why this works:

  • Creates a side‑by‑side comparison with scores and evidence snippets.
  • Labels gaps as Table‑stakes, Differentiator or Thought‑leadership so you know what to fix first.
  • Produces a 100‑word manifesto and new section that only you can own.
  • Suggests original proof assets to make claims credible.

Quick workflow:

  1. Gather your article and one to three competitor pieces or outlines.
  2. Run with an advanced reasoning model for the analysis, stance and new section.
  3. Use a faster model for formatting tables and microcopy variants.
  4. Publish the differentiated rewrite and plan supporting assets.

Copy‑and‑paste prompt:

Act as a category editor. Compare our content against competitors and build a differentiated, evidence‑ready upgrade plan.

Inputs:
- Our audience and goal: [e.g., UK SMB finance leaders; drive demo requests]
- Brand POV to emphasise: [e.g., transparent pricing, strong support]
- Risk/compliance limits: [list]
- British English

Our content:
[PASTE OUR TEXT]

Competitor set (paste excerpts, outlines, or summaries):
[COMP 1]
[COMP 2]
[COMP 3] [optional]

Tasks:
1) Create a comparison table with rows for scope, depth, originality, proof, recency, clarity, conversion cues, and brand fit. Score 0–5 and cite brief snippets as evidence.
2) Identify 8–12 content gaps and missed objections. Tag each as Table‑stakes, Differentiator, or Thought‑leadership.
3) Draft a unique stance and narrative arc that clearly diverges from competitors. Provide a 100‑word manifesto paragraph.
4) Produce two contrasted headline and intro pairs:
   - Authority‑led
   - Challenger‑led
5) Write a new section that only we can credibly own. Flag any claims needing evidence with [CITATION NEEDED] and suggest what evidence would suffice.
6) Propose 3 original data or asset ideas (e.g., poll, mini‑benchmark) to support the stance, including method outline and timeline.
7) Supply a conversion layer: proof elements to add (logos, quotes, numbers), CTA placement, and internal link anchors.

Output: Markdown tables and sections. Keep British English and avoid exposing hidden reasoning. Ask up to 3 clarification questions if inputs are incomplete.

What to measure next:

  • Assisted conversions from the page
  • External links earned from original data
  • Engagement with the new proof assets

 

Content Atomiser and Refresh Calendar

Turn a strong long‑form asset into refreshed on‑page content and multi‑channel derivatives with testing baked in.

Why this works:

  • Refactors the source article for scanability and message clarity.
  • Generates channel‑specific derivatives with Control and Challenger versions.
  • Builds a light 8‑week calendar with owners and success metrics.
  • Sets up measurement and UTM conventions so learning compounds.

Quick workflow:

  1. Paste the source article or outline and list channels in scope.
  2. Run with an advanced reasoning model for refactor, derivatives and experiment design.
  3. Use a faster model to batch social posts, ad variants and UTMs.
  4. Ship Control versions now and schedule Challenger tests through the calendar.

Copy‑and‑paste prompt:

You are a content operations lead. Refactor and repurpose the following long‑form content, then produce a practical refresh and distribution plan.

Inputs:
- Primary audience and stage: [e.g., UK tech founders; consideration]
- Business KPI: [e.g., webinar sign‑ups]
- Brand voice and tone: [e.g., confident, helpful]
- Channels in scope: [e.g., website, LinkedIn, X, email, short video, paid social]
- Key messages to preserve: [list]
- Compliance constraints: [list]
- British English

Source content:
[PASTE FULL TEXT OR LINKED OUTLINE]

Tasks:
1) Refactor the web article: improved H1/H2/H3 outline, scannable formatting, and 120‑word executive summary.
2) Create derivatives:
   - LinkedIn: 3 threads and 5 single‑post ideas.
   - X: 8 punchy posts and 2 polls.
   - Email: 2 subject lines, 1 plain‑text email, 1 newsletter blurb.
   - Video: 60‑second script and a 5‑minute outline with shot list.
   - Ads: 4 copy variants each for awareness and retargeting.
3) Provide two contrasted versions for each derivative: Control vs Challenger with a brief hypothesis for what might win.
4) Build a light 8‑week refresh and distribution calendar: cadence, owner, and success metric per item.
5) Measurement and experimentation: define primary and secondary metrics, sample size rough‑cut, run length guidance, and stop criteria. Include an issues log template.
6) UTM scheme: propose conventions and output ready‑to‑paste examples for each channel.
7) Internal linking plan and 5 FAQ entries to strengthen on‑page depth.

Output as Markdown with tables where helpful. Ask up to 3 clarifying questions only if essential fields are blank. Keep British English.

What to measure next:

  • Assisted pipeline from derivative content
  • CTR on UTMs by channel and message
  • Video completion rates and post‑view conversions

 

Build a ü free personalised ¥ learning plan to see our course recommendations î for you

Free for 30 days

Build a å free personalised ¥ learning plan to see our course recommendations î for you

Free for 30 days